Gunther v. Liverpool, London & Globe Ins.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
1Opinion of the Court
Benedict, D. J.
Prior to the enactment of the fee bill of 1853 the actual disbursements necessarily incurred and de.emed reasonable were allowed in the taxation of costs in accordance with the provision in the laws of the state (2 Rev. St. 727, 3d Ed.) by virtue of the rules of court. See 1 Blatchf. 652. Such is the law now unless modified by the fee bill of 1853. That fee bill, in terms, relates to compensation of the officers named, but does contain a provision (now section 983, Rev. St.) allowing clerks to include in the judgment fees for exemplifications and copies of papers necessarily…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Bank of the Commonwealth v. Mechanics' National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Costs in Civil CasesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1852
- Dennis v. EddyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1874
- Hussey v. BradleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1863
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wooster v. HandyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
- Stallo v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Griffith v. Baltimore & O. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1890
- Monahan v. GodkinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1900
- Corporation of St. Anthony in New Bedford v. HoulihanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1910