Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 19, 2003No. 90,083PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PlERRON, J.:

David Cameron appeals the district court’s decision to terminate a pretrial diversion and to reinstate criminal prosecution. The issue on appeal is whether the termination order is an appealable order and jurisdiction is proper in this court.

After the State successfully appealed the district court’s dismissal of multiple sexual charges against Cameron, he entered a pretrial diversion agreement and prosecution of the case was stayed. Pertinent conditions of Cameron’s diversion included payment of a diversion fee, a reparations fee, a fine, restitution, and attorney fees. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. RuffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. State v. StoughSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McGaughCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2018
  2. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  3. State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API