Doody v. State

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

These appeals are from convictions for burglary with intent to commit theft and theft of property over the value of $50.00; the punishment was assessed at four (4) years in each cause, the sentences to run concurrently.

Appellant’s court appointed counsel has filed briefs stating that after conscientious examination of the records he has concluded these appeals are frivolous and without merit. In compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, and Gainous v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 436 S.W.2d 137, he raises one ground of error which might…