Legal Opinion

Furr v. Noland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 18, 1991No. 9026SC1167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether plaintiff may maintain this action on a claim which was a compulsory counterclaim in a prior lawsuit and on which plaintiff took a voluntary dismissal. We hold that N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 13(a) (1990) controls, and we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the present action.

On 25 June 1986, Steven Furr was operating a truck which collided into a truck operated by Jan Noland. The truck operated by Jan Noland was owned by James Noland; the truck operated by Furr was owned by Frederickson Motor Express Corporation. On 16 May 1987…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Painter v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Union Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Fickley v. Greystone Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Chavez v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. McMillan v. Ryan Jackson Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. STATE Ex Rel. Comm'r Ins. v. CUSTARDNorth Carolina Business Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API