Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 15, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] Hannaford Brothers Co. appeals from a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Board hearing officer (Knopf, HO) establishing that Gail Smith suffers a 27% permanent impairment as a result of the combined effects of three workplace injuries that occurred in 1986, 1997 and 2002 respectively. Hannaford contends that pursuant to 39-A M.R.S. § 213(1-A)(B)(1) (2007), it was error for the hearing officer to stack impairment resulting from the 1986 injury onto the impairment resulting from the more recent injuries. Because a favorable decision on the merits will not provide Hannaford with any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewiston Daily Sun v. School Administrative District No. 43Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Maine Civil Liberties Union v. City of South PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Ten Voters of Biddeford v. City of BiddefordSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  3. Fair Friend Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. CNC Systems, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  4. Legassie v. Securitas, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  5. Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API