Legal Opinion

S. S. Kresge Co. v. Twelve Seventy-Five Woodward Avenue Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1935No. Docket No. 62, Calendar No. 38,034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

In 1923 plaintiff leased premises for 10 years to William and Annie Feinstein. The latter, being indebted to Samuel Cassidy, executed to him a sublease of the premises as security. In 1927, some rather complicated refinancing instruments were executed. The Twelve Seventy-Five Woodward Avenue Corporation was organized to hold the sublease. Thereupon Cassidy canceled his sublease; a-sublease was executed by the Feinsteins to the Twelve Seventy-Five Woodward Avenue Corporation; all the capital stock of the corporation was assigned to Cassidy as security for the debt owed him by the Feinsteins;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forrest v. DurnellTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Otis v. . ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Haley v. Boston Belting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Young v. WyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  5. City Investment Co. v. PringleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shurlow v. BonthuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hawai'i National Bank v. CookHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Huntington National Bank v. Bruinsma (In re Kentwood Pharmacy, L.L.C.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
  4. In re Bromel-Knapp Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API