Legal Opinion

Weinert v. Tallman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 3, 4. Calendar 46,754, 46,755PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

Fred C. Weinert, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed a bill for annulment of the marriage between him and Doris Tallman, hereinafter called defendant. She, in turn, filed a bill for divorce. The cases were consolidated for trial. From decree granting defendant a divorce and, in effect, denying plaintiff an annulment, he appeals.

Plaintiff contends that the marriage was a nullity because, at the time the ceremony was performed, defendant was, and thereafter continued to be, the common-law wife of one Tallman and that, therefore, plaintiff was entitled to an annulment and a decree of divorce…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doertch v. Folwell Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Turbessi v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Shane v. HackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Zerfas v. Eaton County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Leonard EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Magwood v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API