Legal Opinion

Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. Wilken

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1983No. 17808Published

1Opinion of the Court

668 P.2d 493 (1983)

VALLEY BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a Utah corporation, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Curtis W. WILKEN d/b/a Curt Wilken Wholesale Auto and Connie Wilken, his wife, Defendants and Appellant.

No. 17808.

Supreme Court of Utah.

January 20, 1983.

Curtis W. Wilken and Connie Wilken, pro se.

I.H. Biele, Gary Doctorman, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and respondent.

HOWE, Justice:

The plaintiff Valley Bank and Trust Company was granted a summary judgment in this action which it brought against the defendants Curtis W. Wilken and Connie Wilken, his wife, on two promissory notes. Connie Wilken…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. American Publishing Co. v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Cheney v. RuckerUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. General Insurance Co. of America v. Carnicero Dynasty Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hancock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Lewis v. MoultreeUtah Supreme Court · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API