Legal Opinion
Kademian v. Ladish Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 28, 1986No. Nos. 84-2758, 85-1280 and 85-1300PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Ladish Company was a closely-held corporation until October 1981, when it became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Armco, Inc., through a corporate merger.1 This merger resulted in a number of lawsuits, which are consolidated here. William Dixon, Jane Schennum and Robert Eisele represent a class of Ladish shareholders (the “class plaintiffs”) whose Ladish shares were converted to shares of Armco as a result of the merger. Charles Kademian, Stan Janes, Michael Deutsch, Herbert Ende and J.M. Browning are all former vice-presidents of Ladish (the “vice-president plaintiffs”) who…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- R. Richard Bastian, III v. Petren Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wielgos v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,906 Herbert J. Rowe, Cross-Appellants v. Maremont Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,019 Mary Margaret Ward, Cross-Appellants v. Succession of Richard W. Freeman, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Strasenburgh v. StraubmullerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.