Daniel King v. State of Iowa

APPEL, Justice.

The appellant, Daniel King, requests further review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming his denial of postconviction relief. King argues his trial counsel was ineffective in not properly attacking DNA evidence offered by the State at trial. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that King has failed to show a reasonable probability that the verdict would have been different had trial counsel

more adequately developed a response to the State’s evidence. As a result, we affirm the decision of the district court denying King’s application for postconviction relief.

I.…