Legal Opinion

HAWA CONSTRUCTION, LLC v. Pollock

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 18, 2009No. Civil Action No. 09-1728 (RMC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.

This dispute arises from Hawa Construction, LLC’s renovation of Richard M. Pollock’s residence in Washington, D.C. 1 Pending before the Court is Hawa Construction’s motion to dismiss Count I of Mr. Pollock’s counterclaim [Dkt. # 9], which seeks disgorgement of $205,646 paid to Hawa Construction for change orders requested by Mr. Pollock and performed by Hawa Construction but not reduced to writing as required by District of Columbia home improvement regulations. 2 For the reasons explained herein, the motion will be granted.

I. FACTS 3

Mr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Hackney v. Morelite ConstructionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Tauber v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API