People v. Glorioso
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
Defendant, Keith A. Glorioso, was charged with unlawful possession of a substance containing cocaine (720 ILCS 570/402(c) (West 2006)). He moved to suppress evidence seized under a warrant to search his house. After a hearing, the trial court ruled that the search had violated the “knock and announce” rule, but that, under Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586, 165 L. Ed. 2d 56, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006), the exclusionary rule did not apply. After a stipulated bench trial, defendant was convicted and sentenced to 24 months’ probation. On appeal, he contends that, although the evidence cannot be…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Georgia v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- People v. GloriosoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOELLE D. CARONNA STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. FREDDY COLLADO (20-02-0221, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021