Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Norris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1956No. 14674_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

231 F.2d 881

108 U.S.P.Q. 397

Homer E. GILLESPIE, Catherine L. Gillespie and Gillespie

Games Company, a corporation, Appellants,

v.

Coma F. NORRIS, individually and doing business as C. F.

Norris Manufacturing Company, Appellee.

No. 14674.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1956.

Eric A. Rose, Albert D. White, Long Beach, Cal., for appellants.

William C. Babcock, Frederick Mueller, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee.

Before FEE and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges, and WALSH, District Judge.

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

1

This action for infringement of patent was brought by filing complaint. An…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  2. Glens Falls Indemnity Company, a Corporation, and E. F. Grandy, Inc. v. American Seating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marietta Page v. Telford WorkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Playtime Theaters, Inc. v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co., David Colan, and Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API