Legal Opinion
Gillespie v. Norris
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1956No. 14674PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
This action for infringement of patent was brought by filing complaint. An answer was then filed containing general denials and an affirmative defense, which sets up several prior patents claimed to anticipate the device patented and to show that it lacked novelty, utility and invention, and a “counterclaim”, which is actually a claim for damages against plaintiffs as a result of conspiracy to use the letters patent in restraint of trade. An “Answer to Counter-claim” appears in the record, but the denials apparently do not refer to the paragraphs of the answer…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Glens Falls Indemnity Company, a Corporation, and E. F. Grandy, Inc. v. American Seating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by15 opinions
- Zenaida Garc A-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Morris J. Starsky v. Jack R. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Wilson v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Ralph A. NIELSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.