Legal Opinion
Chiayu Chang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 7, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–1740 (JDB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs, as limited partners, have little control over Lucky's operations or finances. Instead, full "management, operation and control of" Lucky's is "vested exclusively in the General Partner," a company named LFM Stores, LLC. AR 18, 101-02. The general partner can distribute profits to the limited partners "at such times as determined by the General Partner in its sole discretion," up to a maximum 1% annual return on their original investments. AR 92, 99-100. The Lucky's Limited Partnership Agreement ("LPA") also includes two sections regulating the redemption of plaintiffs'…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tingzi Wang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Huashan Zhang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Envtl. Prot. AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Wang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Mirror Lake Vill. v. NielsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.