Legal Opinion
Mirror Lake Vill. v. Nielson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 14, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16-1955 (TFH)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
II. Factual Background
a. The Investments in Mirror Lake
According to Mirror Lake's Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (hereinafter "the Agreement"), which outlines the terms of the plaintiffs' investments in the company, the seven plaintiff-investors-Yanxue Deng, Hui Ge, Lei Hu, Ge Li, Zhichun Li, Ying Su, and Yue Wang, each invested $500,000 in Mirror Lake. J.A. at 18. Despite their equal investments, they received different percentages of interests in the company, ranging from .5% to 3%. Id. The investors each have the right to exercise a put option allowing them to force the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mirror Lake Village, LLC v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Tingzi Wang v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019