Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Jose Valdivia-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2017No. 15-50384Published

1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge

Jose Valdivia-Flores was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in violation of Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.401. The majority describes our task as “determin[ing] whether Valdi-via-Flores’ conviction under Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.401 was for an aggravated felony.” Majority Opinion, p. 1206. Yet, inexplicably, the majority completely fails to address that statute.

In determining whether Valdivia-Flores was convicted of an aggraved felony, we compare the state statute of conviction to the generic federal definition of possession with intent to deliver a controlled…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Salazar-Luviano v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Alejandro Burgos-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Roberto Roman-Suaste v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API