United States v. Jose Valdivia-Flores
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge
Jose Valdivia-Flores was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance in violation of Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.401. The majority describes our task as “determin[ing] whether Valdi-via-Flores’ conviction under Wash. Rev. Code § 69.50.401 was for an aggravated felony.” Majority Opinion, p. 1206. Yet, inexplicably, the majority completely fails to address that statute.
In determining whether Valdivia-Flores was convicted of an aggraved felony, we compare the state statute of conviction to the generic federal definition of possession with intent to deliver a controlled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Salazar-Luviano v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ortiz-Magana v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alejandro Burgos-OrtegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Roberto Roman-Suaste v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.