Legal Opinion

Trinkle v. Leeney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1995No. 45A05-9404-CV-141PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARTEAU, Judge.

This appeal originates from an agreement between the administrator of an estate and the estate's attorney for the purchase of real property from the estate. In issue are a promissory note the purchaser executed in favor of the estate and amounts the purchaser seeks to credit against the note. The estate has since closed and the attorney has since died, leaving an heir and a widow to resolve this dispute.

We offer a summary of the trial court's Findings of Fact in order to provide a brief explanation of what transpired.

FACTS

The property central to this appeal is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. University Casework Systems, Inc. v. BahreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Rodman v. RodmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. American Cyanamid Co. v. StephenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Canaday v. CanadayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Newton, Admx. v. HuntIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Culley v. McFadden Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Gehlbach v. HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Williamson v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Castlewood Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. TreptonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Konger v. SchillaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API