Outsource Services Management, LLC v. Nooksack Business Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*274f 1 Washington State courts have jurisdiction over civil cases arising on Indian reservations as long as it does not infringe on the sovereignty of the tribe. At issue in this case is whether Washington State courts have jurisdiction over a civil case arising out of a contract in which the tribal corporation waived its sovereign immunity and consented to jurisdiction in Washington State courts. We hold that it does not infringe on the sovereignty of the tribe to honor its own corporation’s decision to enter into a contract providing for jurisdiction in Washington State courts.
Owens, J.
FACTS
f2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Stephen Kerr Eugster v. Washington State Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Gary C'hair and Rochelle C'hair v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District, State of Wyoming, and John StroheckerWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- People ex rel. Becerra v. Huber, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- State v. ShaleWashington Supreme Court · 2015
- Spencer v. Franklin Hills Health-Spokane, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.