Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2000No. 24568PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

In this companion case to State v. Wright, 134 Idaho 73, 996 P.2d 292 (2000), appellant appeals the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress and the sentence imposed. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

The facts of this ease are identical to those set forth in the companion case, State v. Wright, 134 Idaho 73, 996 P.2d 292 (2000).

B. Procedural Background

On September 8, 1997, E. Wright was charged with trafficking in methamphetamine. On November 6, 1997, he moved to suppress “all evidentiary fruits” obtained by the State as a result of his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. DuValtIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. JohnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HenageIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. HansonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State v. CardIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API