Legal Opinion

McKee v. Pacific Power and Light Company

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1966No. 3490PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The plaintiff, James F. McKee, an electrician, was doing work on cable belonging to a television company and which was attached to poles of the defendant, Pacific Power and Light Company. The work involved disconnecting and unwinding tie wires which supported the cable. A tie wire broke and came in contact with high-voltage power lines of defendant causing electric shock and injury to plaintiff.

In a suit for damages, based on negligence of the power company, the trial court, at the close of all of the evidence, directed the jury to return a verdict for defendant. The plaintiff has- appealed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Watts v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Moore v. Southwestern Sash & Door Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Benard v. VorlanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Jones v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Kyle A. Ruhs v. Pacific Power & Light, a Maine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  5. Sherman v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API