Legal Opinion

Gill v. Coyne

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided October 14, 2021No. 3:18-cv-00631Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-00631-CHL ERIC GILL, Plaintiff, v. JAMES COYNE , et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Eric Gill (“Gill”) alleges that he was subjected to various infringements on his civil rights and seeks relief under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

for violations of the First and Eighth Amendments to the United States Constitution and under 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2 for violations of his statutory free exercise rights. (DN 1, at PageID # 3–12.) Gill brings these claims against Defendants James Coyne…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API