Legal Opinion
Clark v. Gerstley
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 25, 1907No. 169PublishedCited by 4 opinions
ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The facts are stated in the-opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham
The defendants in error, plaintiffs below, obtained judgment against the plaintiff in error for $5,000 and interest in April, 1905, in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 26 App. D. C. 205, and the plaintiff in error has- brought the case here for review.
It is the same action"'as the foregoing case, just decided, but the plaintiff, in error, who was one of the sureties in the bond; separately filed special pleas to the declaration, which were separately demurred to, and the Supreme Court sustained the demurrer. On appeal to the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Greene v. KaufmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Westrumite Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920