Legal Opinion

Miller v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 2, 1942No. Civ. 13462PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS (Jess E.), J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant from that portion of an interlocutory decree of divorce which provides as follows: “It is further ordered and adjudged that defendant keep up the $5,000 insurance policy now in effect in favor of the minor child of the parties hereto and pay the premiums regularly, as security for of the minor as herein ordered.” A separate appeal was also taken from the action of the trial court in adding the last ten words of the above, to wit: “as security for support of the minor as herein ordered.” This was done “by the court’s own motion”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tremper v. TremperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  2. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Simpson v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farley v. FarleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Kern v. KernDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. Knowles v. KnowlesDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1973
  4. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. KitchensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Bevelle v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API