Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
These cases present issues of extreme importance affecting workers covered by collective bargaining agreements. We must decide whether a claim of retaliatory discharge, a claim of intentional interference with an employment contract, and a claim that certain discharge procedures are defective, are preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a) (1982).1 We conclude that § 301 preempts these state claims, and therefore affirm the judgments of the district court.
I
A
The facts underlying Lingle are not disputed. The plaintiff, Lingle, was an…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Walter Spearman v. Exxon Coal Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United Airlines, Inc. v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Lepore v. National Tool and Mfg. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Elizabeth B. Mayo v. Michael P. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Brown v. Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.