Travis v. Aaronson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
The original action in the district court of Tulsa county was instituted for the purpose of setting aside a judgment of dismissal procured in another action, such dismissal being alleged to have been procured by fraud practiced by the successful party in obtaining the judgment of dismissal.
The action is presumably brought under paragraph 4 of section 810, Comp. Stat. 1921, which provides that the district court shall have the power to vacate or modify its own judgments or orders for such fraud. The proceedings are by verified petition in a separate action, setting up fully the proceedings…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- King v. GantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Harper v. Rutland Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Salmon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- White v. KroegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coker v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926