Legal Opinion

Aviation Credit Corp. of New York v. University Aerial Service Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1933No. 1047PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

The appellee instituted this suit for the purpose of recovering double the amount of usurious interest alleged to have been paid to appellant under a contract. In due time appellant filed its plea of privilege to be sued in Bexar county, to which appellee filed exceptions as to its sufficiency, and also- a controverting plea. Notice of the controverting plea was not served upon appellant or its attorneys. Later in the same term, without notice to appellant, appellee presented its exceptions, which were by the court sustained, and an order was entered striking the plea…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alpha Petroleum Co. v. TerrellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  2. Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Holcomb v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Gamel v. City Nat. Bank of Colorado Tex.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Government Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Ballard v. ShockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Hardt v. Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. HerrmannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API