People v. Tennant
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Simon
Under proper circumstances prior recorded testimony can be admitted against a criminal defendant without violating the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment; this is not such a case. I do not read California v. Green (1970), 399 U.S. 149, or Barber v. Page (1968), 390 U.S. 719, cited by the majority as support for an absolute rule of admissibility allowing the use of preliminary-hearing testimony any time a witness is unavailable and an opportunity to cross-examine was presented at the preliminary hearing. In addition, neither oase deals with the type of due process problem that arises…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Quock Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The People v. MalmenatoIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.