Legal Opinion

In Matter of Civil Contempt of Kroll

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 24, 1981No. 80-064PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal from an order holding Donald Kroll in civil contempt. Because Kroll timely filed a request for substitution of judge pursuant to sec. 801.68(1), Stats., the trial judge had no jurisdiction to hear the contempt proceeding, except to determine if the request was correct as to form and timely filed. We therefore vacate the order and remand the case with directions.

Initially, the trial judge was hearing a divorce matter involving Susan and Armand Bartell. Armand was not at the divorce hearing. He had vanished the year before taking with him the couple’s three children, contrary…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pure Milk Products Cooperative v. National Farmers OrganizationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Bahr v. GalonskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Tarney v. McCormackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oman v. HunkinsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  2. State ex rel. J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hillcrest Golf & Country Club v. City of AltoonaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. City of La Crosse v. Jiracek Cos., Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. James L.J. v. Circuit Court for Walworth CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API