Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Borough of Stroudsburg

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 3, 1993No. Civ. No. 92-521PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

NEALON, District Judge.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint, the plaintiffs,.Charles A. Schmidt and Robert H. Greene, have alleged violations of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, specifically, the deprivation of a property interest in being denied eligibility for, and the actual position of, police officer for the Borough of Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania. In essence, the plaintiffs contend that the defendants conspired to “fix” the qualifying examinations in order to appoint Kenneth Nevil to the position of patrolman, thereby denying the opportunity for employment to them.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Boro of StroudsburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API