Legal Opinion

Certification From the U.S. Dist. Court for the E. Dist. of Wash. in Mariano Carranza v. Dovex Fruit Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2018No. 94229-3PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

*614¶ 1 The Washington Minimum Wage Act (MWA), chapter 49.46 RCW, requires employers to compensate employees for their work. This case asks us to apply that general principle to the specific context of agricultural workers who are paid on a piece-rate basis for piece-rate picking work by answering the following two questions, which were certified to us by Judge Mendoza of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington:

A. Does Washington law require agricultural employers to pay their pieceworkers *1208for time spent performing activities outside of piece-rate picking work…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Burnside v. Simpson Paper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Martinez-Cuevas v. DeRuyter Bros. Dairy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hill v. Xerox Bus. Servs., LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Port Of Tacoma, V. Joel Sacks, Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. Alaska Airlines v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Eldina Novalic, V. Peacehealth Sw Wa Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API