Legal Opinion

Sostheim v. Sostheim

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1941No. 27,524PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichman, J.

There are only two questions raised by this appeal both arising on conflicting evidence which we are asked to weigh. Divorce was granted to appellee on his complaint.

It is claimed that the trial court did not have jurisdiction because appellee’s residence in the state for one year and in Kosciusko county, where the action originated, for at least six months immediately preceding the filing of the action, was not sufficiently proved as required by § 3-1203, Burns’ 1933, § 904, Baldwin’s 1934. Two householders testified that he had resided in Kosciusko county for more than the six months and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. McMurrey v. McMurreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Weidenhammer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Warner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Eward v. EwardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stinson v. StinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Bone v. BoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. In Re the Marriage of HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Adkins v. AdkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Oliver v. Estate of OliverIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API