Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Jennings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1902No. 3998PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whitman County. — TIon. William McDonald, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Hadley, J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note dated November 3, 1890, and maturing one year after date. Several partial payments were made npon the note; the last one having been made upon December 22, 1893. This suit was commenced on the 22d day of December, 1899. The defendants James Jennings and Joe Schnurr demanded a bill of particulars stating by whom the several payments were made. The demand was granted as to all payments made after maturity of the note. A bill of particulars was filed, and, among other things, it was alleged therein that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bemis v. LeonardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. McGinn v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Smith v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Stubblefield v. McAuliffWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Spencer v. HaugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kelly v. Independent Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Evans v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Allen v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. San Poil Consolidated Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API