Legal Opinion

Groff v. Friedline

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided October 15, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment in favor of the defendant, entered upon a .verdict.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

The plaintiff brings this, action to recover of the defendant the amount due to him as assignee of Benedict & Fowler for goods sold and delivered.

Upon the trial the defendant withdrew from consideration every .defense except an alleged claim for imperfect goods, goods returned, and the sum of $462, which she claimed she had paid the plaintiff’s assignors prior to the date of the assignment.

It appears from, the evidence that about November 20, 1894, H. W. Benedict, one of the plaintiff’s assignors, obtained *238from B. W. Williams his promissory note for $462, dated November 20, 1894, payable to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. . KunzmullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Chance v. Isaacs & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  3. Maas v. GoodmanNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Rice Lake v. Citizens' State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Shaw v. Snyder Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API