Legal Opinion

Crane Security Technologies, Inc. v. Rolling Optics, AB

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 3, 2017No. Civil Action No. 14-12428-LTSPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON ROLLING OPTICS AB’S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IMPROPERLY WITHHELD (#192).

KELLEY, United States Magistrate Judge

I. Introduction

Crane Security Technologies, Inc., is the exclusive licensee of the five U.S. patents at issue in this case.1 The patents “relate generally to optical systems that project synthetic images that ‘move’ and that include image icons formed as voids or recesses.” #79 ¶ 1. Crane “is the exclusive supplier of banknote paper for United States currency and also supplies other counterfeit-deterrent banknote papers and security devices used around the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  4. In Re Spalding Sports Worldwide, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re the Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bankdirect Capital Finance, LLC v. Capital Premium Financing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  3. Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  5. Lawson v. Spirit Aerosystems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API