Legal Opinion
Judy-Philippine Inc. v. S/S VERAZANO BRIDGE
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 23, 1992No. 89 Civ. 7112 (RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judy-Philippine, Inc. (“Judy-Philippine”) has moved to amend its complaint pursuant to Rule 15 and for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed. R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
In an Opinion dated December 23, 1991, familiarity with which is assumed, Judy-Philippine, Inc. v. S/S VERAZANO BRIDGE, 781 F.Supp. 253 (S.D.N.Y.1991), Judy-Philippine’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability was granted, its motion on the issue of damages was denied, and the summary…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Donald Binder v. Long Island Lighting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Eugene A. BAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIMES MIRROR MAGAZINES, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- St. Johns N. F. Shipping Corp. v. . S. A. Companhia Geral Commercial Do Rio De JaneiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cimino v. GlazeDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Siemens Energy & Automation, Inc. v. Coleman Electrical Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999