Legal Opinion
Cimino v. Glaze
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 18, 2005No. 02-CV-6603LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Raymond Cimino, commenced this action on November 18, 2002, asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law against the City of Rochester (“the City”) and two Rochester police officers, Mark Glaze and Michael Mareano. Plaintiffs claims arise out of an incident that occurred on July 26, 2001, when plaintiff was allegedly struck in the arm by a bullet fired by either Glaze or Mareano following a police chase of a truck being driven by plaintiff.
The original, pro se complaint sets forth three causes of action: (1) what…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Sanville v. MccaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dawkins v. WilliamsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Chavis v. Syracuse Police DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Wang v. ShenDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019
- Watson v. Wheeler Clinic, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2022