Legal Opinion

Kellee Kendell v. Clement Burr Shanklin, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 28, 2025No. 2:20-cv-00985Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KELLEE KENDELL, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:20-cv-985 Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. C LEMENT BURR SHANKLIN, et al., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Defendant Clement Burr Shanklin’s Motion to Modify Payment Method Pursuant to Settlement Agreement (Doc. 140) and Plaintiff’s “cross-request[s]” (Docs. 142, 146) are before the Court. For the following reasons, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff’s “cross-request[s]” are DENIED (Doc. 142). I. BACKGROUND The Court previously…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brock v. Scheuner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Stephanie Ann Brown v. The County of Genesee, Michigan Council 25, Afscme Afl-Cio, Local 2259Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. Michael McKim v. New Market Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API