Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Duke University
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided January 22, 2004No. 1:97 CV 00959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BEATY, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees [Document # 132], pursuant to which Plaintiff seeks to have the Court award attorney’s fees. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Amended Motion for Award of Attorney’s Fees is GRANTED.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In October 2000, this Court held a bifurcated jury trial on Plaintiff Heather Sue Mercer’s (“Plaintiff’ or “Mercer”) claims of gender discrimination against Duke University (“Defendant” or “Duke”) brought pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Daly v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friolo v. FrankelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Wagner v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Gifford v. Horry County South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
- Shah Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2014