State v. Sutterfield
Court of Appeals of Oregon
JOSEPH, P.J.
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, P.J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for rape in the first degree, sodomy in the first degree and kidnapping in the second degree, contending that the trial court erred in allowing the state to call a witness who it knew would invoke his privilege against self incrimination.
The state called the witness, Steven Ewing, to testify on rebuttal. Out of the presence of the jury, the court asked him whether he intended to answer any questions. Ewing emphatically refused, because he had an appeal pending from convictions for crimes resulting from the same events that he would be asked to testify about.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RawlsOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. AbbottOregon Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DictadoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Ellison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Martin v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.