Legal Opinion

State v. Rawls

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1969PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Rawls and Frazier were jointly indicted for murder. Separate trials were held, Frazier’s being the first. He was convicted. On the subsequent trial of Rawls, Frazier testified, even though his case was on appeal and he could have claimed the privilege against self-incrimination. Rawls was convicted of second-degree murder and appealed to this court, which reversed and remanded the case for a new trial. State v. Rawls, 247 Or 328, 429 P2d 574 (1967). In the meantime, this court had affirmed Frazier’s conviction and Frazier had then filed for a writ of habeas corpus in the United…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. People v. PickettMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. State v. DeColaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodgersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. State v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. SmythOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HerreraOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API