Spiegel v. Gnadzinski
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Boomer and Lawton, JJ.
(dissenting). We would affirm. The only reason advanced by plaintiff in support of his request for equitable relief is that there was a mutual mistake with respect to the extent of his injury. Plaintiff failed, however, to produce evidence in admissible form that the injuries now complained of were sufficiently different from those known to him at the time he executed the settlement agreement (see, Mangini v McClurg, 24 NY2d 556, 564; Marchello v Lenox Hill Hosp., 107 AD2d 566, affd 65 NY2d 833; Elson v Delaney, 47 AD2d 708; Viskovich v Walsh-Fuller-Slattery, 16 AD2d 67, *900…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Viskovich v. Walsh-Fuller-SlatteryNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Viskovich v. Walsh-Fuller-SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
- Marchello v. Lenox Hill HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Elson v. DelaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.