Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Cereghino

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1929No. Docket No. 3893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant has appealed.

A careful examination of the record shows that there is no allegation, proof or finding on the question of the adequacy of the consideration which the plaintiff agreed to pay for the property. The judgment, therefore, must be reversed. (Civ. Code, sec. 3391; Salisbury v. Yawger, 184 Cal. 783, 795 [195 Pac. 682] ; Laguna Land & Water Co. v. Greenwood, 92 Cal. App. 570 [268 Pac. 699]; Boulenger v. Morrison, 88 Cal. App. 664 [264 Pac. 256];…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. LampeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Salisbury v. YawgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Boulenger v. MorisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Walker v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Laguna Land & Water Co. v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacKay v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API