Legal Opinion

Allen v. Frakes

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided August 28, 2020No. 8:19-cv-00212Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA KEVIN L. ALLEN, Petitioner, 8:19CV212 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SCOTT FRAKES, Director NDCS; Respondent. This matter is before me on Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment (filing 14) claiming that Petitioner Kevin L. Allen’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (filing 12) must be dismissed because it is barred by the limitations period set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). I agree and will dismiss the petition with prejudice. Consequently, Allen’s request for leave to file a response to Respondent’s reply brief (filing 24),…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API