Legal Opinion
Independence Federal Savings Bank v. Huntley
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1990No. 88-1642PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellee brought suit against appellant (the Bank) for wrongful foreclosure and wrongful eviction. At the close of the evidence, the trial court directed a verdict for plaintiff on liability as to both counts on the ground that the bank had failed to give proper statutory notice of proposed foreclosure under D.C.Code § 45-715(b) (1986). A jury then returned a verdict on damages, awarding plaintiff $30,000 for wrongful foreclosure and $500 for loss of personal property during the wrongful eviction.
An appeal, the Bank’s primary contention is that the directed verdict on liability was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boddie v. RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Dikomey Manufacturing Jewelers, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Security Pacific Finance Corp. v. BishopIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Robinson v. KerwinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union v. CuellarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- DENNIS T. COMER v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Kibunja v. Alturas, L.L.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.