Legal Opinion
Sturdivant v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided November 30, 2006No. 3:05-CV-2228-MPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LYNN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Defendant Target Corporation (“Target”) owns and operates a national chain of retail stores. On October 25, 2003, Plaintiff Gloria J. Sturdivant visited Target’s Store # 1775 to exchange an item she had previously purchased. After waiting in line for several minutes, Sturdivant walked up to the customer service counter. As she neared the counter, Sturdivant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pena v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Cynthia Murray v. Chick-Fil-A, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Seale v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2018
- Alice Townson v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Bollman v. Walmart Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.