Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. David Harris Miller

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 20, 2018No. 18-4158PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNCAN, Circuit Judge:

Appellant David Harris Miller seeks interlocutory review of a pretrial order denying his motion to release seized assets. The government argues that these assets will be subject to forfeiture if he is convicted of pending criminal charges. Miller challenges the relationship between the seized assets and the criminal charges on which their forfeiture is predicated. Because the district court did not err in finding probable cause that the assets were "involved in" charged money laundering offenses and "traceable to" charged fraud and money laundering offenses, we affirm.

I

Mi…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kaley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. Mauricio Javier PucheCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. BornfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. In Re DameronCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. PeckCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  2. Arrowsmith, Liquidating Trustee v. First United Methodist Church Centre, AlabamaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
  3. Palmetto State Armory, LLC v. IKON WEAPONS, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  4. Rechnitz v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. United States of America v. Real Property Located at 6 Lumahai Street in Portlock, Hawaii, et al.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2026

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API