Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Grayden v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 17, 2003No. 02-10218Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBirch, Circuit Judge

I wholeheartedly agree with the majority’s conclusion that the tenants in this case have alleged a violation of their constitutional right to contemporaneous and personal notice of a right to appeal their evictions. I write separately because I disagree with its wholesale rejection of the Supreme Court’s decision in Memphis Light, as well as the decision to grant qualified immunity.

The majority concludes that a government official could not have reasonably known that the summary condemnation of property and subsequent eviction of its residents without providing them personal notice of their…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API