Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 13, 1935No. 25062PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. To sustain a conviction of a felony on the testimony -of an accomplice, “there must be corroborating circumstances which, in themselves and independently of the testimony of the accomplice, directly connect the defendant with the crime, or lead to the inference that ho is guilty.” Stokes v. State, 19 Ga. App. 235 (91 S. E. 271); Levister v. State, 21 Ga. App. 50 (93 S. E. 513); Childers v. State, 52 Ga. 106. “Corroborating evidence which, without going to this extent, merely casts a grave suspicion upon the accused is not sufficient.” Taylor v. State, 110 Ga. 150 (3) (35 S. E. 161).

2.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  2. Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Stokes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Levister v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  3. Patterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API