Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Grimes

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1985PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which held that a conviction pursuant to KRS 218A.990(2) could not be enhanced pursuant to the general persistent felony offender statute.

The legal issue presented is whether a sentence pursuant to a conviction of trafficking in a Schedule III controlled substance subsequent offender case under KRS 218A.990(2), may be used as a basis to enhance punishment under the general persistent felony offender statute.

Grimes was originally convicted in circuit court of trafficking in a controlled substance second offense with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boulder v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Eary v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Heady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jackson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Rudolph v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Parson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  5. Morrow v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API