Commonwealth v. Grimes
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.
This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which held that a conviction pursuant to KRS 218A.990(2) could not be enhanced pursuant to the general persistent felony offender statute.
The legal issue presented is whether a sentence pursuant to a conviction of trafficking in a Schedule III controlled substance subsequent offender case under KRS 218A.990(2), may be used as a basis to enhance punishment under the general persistent felony offender statute.
Grimes was originally convicted in circuit court of trafficking in a controlled substance second offense with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boulder v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Eary v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Heady v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
- Jackson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Rudolph v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. DelaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- Parson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Lawson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Morrow v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.